Starbucks retains dominant mental availability but has converted habitual loyalty into resigned dependency — 4 of 4 respondents named it first in category recall yet 4 of 4 described their relationship as reluctant convenience rather than genuine preference, creating a brand held in place by ubiquity rather than advocacy.
⚠ Synthetic pre-research — AI-generated directional signal. Not a substitute for real primary research. Validate findings with real respondents at Gather →
Starbucks owns top-of-mind awareness universally across all four respondents, yet this mental availability masks a dangerous erosion: the brand has shifted from 'preferred choice' to 'default I resent.' Every respondent spontaneously cited price increases as a primary grievance, with specific references to drinks costing $6-8 that previously cost $4-5. The stated positioning of premium quality and community ('third place') is actively contradicted by consumer perception — Tyler called it 'corporate America in a green apron' while David dismissed it as 'the McDonald's of coffee.' The highest-leverage action is not defending price but reframing value through consistency guarantees: Maria and David both cited quality inconsistency between locations as amplifying their price sensitivity, suggesting that operational reliability improvements would provide more ROI than promotional discounting. The brand's current trajectory converts high-frequency customers into passive critics who will defect at the first convenient alternative — Ashley's admission that 'I'm definitely not as blindly loyal as I used to be' signals the window for intervention is now, before habitual behavior fully decouples from brand preference.
Four interviews provide consistent directional signal on price perception and brand positioning disconnect, with notable convergence across diverse demographics (nurse, lawyer, designer, marketing manager). However, sample lacks geographic diversity outside urban/suburban contexts and skews toward current or recent users, potentially missing defector perspectives. The uniformity of 'first in mental list but resented' finding increases confidence in that specific pattern.
⚠ Only 4 interviews — treat as very early signal only.
Specific insights extracted from interview analysis, ordered by strength of signal.
Ashley: 'Starbucks is definitely first... it's not even close' paired with 'They've gotten a bit too comfortable lately'; Tyler: 'Starbucks is still the first name that pops up, even though I've been trying to avoid them'; Maria: 'Starbucks is probably still number one, but that's more out of habit than love'; David: 'it's Starbucks first - that's just automatic' combined with 'overpriced convenience'
Stop investing in awareness campaigns; reallocate to value perception and experience consistency initiatives. Brand salience without brand love creates a hollow franchise vulnerable to any competitor achieving similar convenience.
Ashley: 'paying like $7 for what used to be a $4 drink'; Tyler: '$6 for a latte that probably costs them 50 cents'; Maria: 'looking at $6-7 for a basic drink and thinking that's almost my lunch budget'; David: 'I'm dropping $8 on what used to be a $5 drink'
Current pricing strategy is actively eroding brand equity faster than it generates margin. Deploy visible value anchors (size guarantees, quality promises) rather than promotional discounting, which reinforces 'overpriced until discounted' framing.
David: 'The downtown location makes my americano perfectly, but the one near the train station burns it half the time. For what I'm paying, that's unacceptable'; Ashley: 'my usual order keeps getting messed up more often'; Maria: 'half the time my drink tastes different depending on who makes it'
Operational consistency improvements will deliver outsized brand perception ROI. Implement location-level quality audits tied to barista training, with customer-facing 'made right' guarantees to shift risk perception.
Tyler: 'feel-good marketing about supporting farmers or whatever, but then they're union-busting their own workers'; 'they want credit for being progressive but they're still just maximizing profit like any other corporation'
Retire or dramatically reduce progressive/ethical messaging in advertising until operational credibility is rebuilt. Current values claims are perceived as hypocrisy and actively damaging rather than neutral.
Ashley: 'They need to fix their app and mobile ordering mess. I can't tell you how many times I've ordered ahead, shown up, and my drink isn't ready or they're out of oat milk'; Tyler: 'they keep pushing their app so hard... feels too corporate and pushy'
Audit mobile order fulfillment rates by location; deprioritize app download campaigns until fulfillment reliability exceeds 95%. Consider 'ready guarantee' with automatic compensation for wait times exceeding commitment.
Implement a location-verified 'Made Right Promise' with automatic rewards credit for any order that doesn't meet a 5-minute ready window or requires remake — 3 of 4 respondents cited execution inconsistency as the amplifier of their price grievances. Converting operations into a visible brand commitment could shift narrative from 'overpriced' to 'worth it because reliable.' Maria's comment that she 'can't tell you how many times' orders were wrong suggests tracking and communicating improvement would differentiate meaningfully.
The brand is currently held in place by convenience infrastructure rather than preference — respondents are actively seeking alternatives (Tyler hitting 'local spots like Case Study or Coava,' Maria comparing 'with Dunkin' and even McDonald's coffee,' David going to 'the local place in Greenwich more often'). If any competitor achieves comparable ubiquity or mobile ordering convenience, defection barriers disappear instantly. The 90-day menu controversy has accelerated active consideration of alternatives among previously autopilot customers.
High-income respondent (David) expresses identical price sensitivity framing as budget-constrained respondent (Maria), suggesting price grievance is about perceived fairness rather than absolute affordability
Respondents want both personalized premium service (David's 'premium lane') and approachable community positioning — these positioning territories may be mutually exclusive
Tyler actively avoids Starbucks on values grounds yet still names it first in category recall and admits going 'when desperate' — stated values and actual behavior are misaligned
Themes that appeared consistently across multiple personas, with supporting evidence.
All respondents maintain Starbucks as a behavioral default despite active dissatisfaction, driven entirely by ubiquity and predictability rather than product or brand affinity.
"I still go there though, because what's my alternative - spend twenty minutes at some indie place explaining why I need oat milk?"
Respondents across income levels have crossed a psychological threshold where price increases feel exploitative rather than premium, with specific memory of previous price points.
"They've priced out people like me who aren't making tech salaries but still want decent coffee."
The brand is perceived as having abandoned authenticity for scale, with 'corporate' appearing as a pejorative across multiple respondents.
"Starbucks feels like corporate America in a green apron, you know? They've got this whole 'third place' community vibe they push, but when I'm actually in there, it's just people on laptops ignoring each other while overpaying for burnt coffee."
Despite criticism, respondents still credit Starbucks for delivering predictable products and environments — when execution delivers, which is increasingly inconsistent.
"Every Pike Place tastes the same to me, which is what I want when I'm paying $5 for coffee instead of making it at home."
Ranked criteria that determine how buyers evaluate, choose, and commit.
Location within daily routine, fast service, reliable mobile ordering
Mobile order fulfillment unreliable; Ashley: 'ordered ahead, shown up, and my drink isn't ready'
Price feels justified by product quality and experience consistency
Universal perception of unjustified increases; all respondents cited specific dollar amounts with negative framing
Same drink tastes identical across locations and baristas
David: 'The quality inconsistency drives me crazy'; Maria: 'half the time my drink tastes different'
Actions match stated commitments on sustainability, worker treatment
Tyler: 'union-busting their own workers' while marketing ethics; perceived as 'performative'
Competitors and alternatives mentioned across interviews, and what buyers said about them.
Blue-collar, value-oriented, less pretentious
Price — Maria: 'Their prices are way more reasonable, especially with their app deals'
Perceived as lower quality, less premium atmosphere
Authentic, better quality, values-aligned, community-connected
Tyler: 'at least I know where my money's going and the coffee's actually better'; David: 'If a colleague wanted serious coffee, I'd send them to Blue Bottle'
Inconvenient locations, inconsistent availability, sometimes higher prices
Regional alternative with energy and friendliness (Portland market)
Tyler mentioned as second in mental list after Starbucks
Limited geographic footprint
Copy directions grounded in how respondents actually think and talk about this topic.
Retire standalone value/ethics messaging immediately — 'ethical sourcing' language is triggering cynicism rather than trust. If used, must be paired with specific, verifiable operational commitments.
Lead with consistency and reliability proof points: 'Same great [drink] at every location' or 'Your order, made right, or we make it right' — directly address the quality variance complaint driving price sensitivity.
Avoid price-focused promotions that reinforce 'overpriced until discounted' framing. Instead, communicate value through commitment language: 'Ready when you arrive' rather than '20% off Tuesdays.'
The phrase 'your usual' resonates — 3 of 4 respondents referenced having established orders. Personalization messaging should emphasize routine reliability rather than discovery or novelty.
Projected from interview analyses using Bayesian scaling. Treat as directional estimates, not census measurements.
Side-by-side comparison of sentiment, intent, buying stage, and decision role across all personas.
Complete question-by-question responses with per-persona analysis. Click any respondent to expand.
Ashley represents the conflicted loyal customer - Starbucks owns her routine despite growing frustration with pricing and service reliability. She uses it 3-4 times weekly out of convenience necessity rather than brand love, viewing it as expensive but reliable fuel for her busy parent lifestyle.
Without prompting, which brands come to mind first in this category? Where does this brand land in that mental list?
Starbucks is definitely first - like, it's not even close. When I think coffee, I think Starbucks. Then probably Dunkin', but honestly that's more like "oh right, that exists too." After that it gets fuzzy - maybe local places here in Austin, but I can't even name them off the top of my head because I'm usually just hitting the Starbucks drive-thru between dropping kids off and getting to work. Starbucks just owns that mental real estate for me. It's where my brain goes automatically when I need caffeine and don't want to think about it.
Walk me through your honest first impression of this brand — not what they claim, but what you actually believe.
Look, Starbucks is premium coffee for busy people who want to feel like they're treating themselves without actually thinking about it. It's become this weird status symbol where carrying their cup signals you have your life together, even when you're totally drowning. I mean, I'm literally there three times a week with my kids before soccer practice because it's fast, consistent, and they know my order. But honestly? They've gotten a bit too comfortable lately. The prices are insane now and some of their recent menu changes feel like they're chasing trends instead of just being the reliable coffee place they used to be. Still go there though, because what's my alternative - spend twenty minutes at some indie place explaining why I need oat milk?
What 3–5 words do you most associate with this brand? Give me your gut, not what sounds polite.
Expensive. Everywhere. Basic. Habit. Look, I'm not trying to be mean, but that's what comes to mind immediately. It's my daily routine - I hit the drive-thru on my way to drop the kids off because it's literally on every corner and I know exactly what I'm getting. But let's be real, I'm paying like $6 for what's essentially coffee with sugar, and half my Instagram feed is people posting their Starbucks cups like it's some kind of personality trait.
How has your perception of this brand shifted over the past year or two? What drove that change?
Honestly? I've gotten a little frustrated with them lately. The prices have gotten pretty ridiculous - I'm paying like $7 for what used to be a $4 drink, and my usual order keeps getting messed up more often. As someone juggling work and kids, I don't have time to go back and fix a wrong order, you know? Plus I keep seeing all this drama on my Instagram feed about labor issues and menu changes that nobody asked for. I still go there because it's convenient and the kids know what they like, but I'm definitely not as blindly loyal as I used to be. When even your most reliable brands start letting you down, it makes you question everything.
When would you actively recommend this brand, and when would you steer someone away?
I'd recommend Starbucks to other busy parents in a heartbeat - like when my mom friends are asking where to grab coffee before school pickup or need a reliable spot with WiFi for working remotely. It's that safe choice where you know exactly what you're getting, the app works, and there's always a location nearby. I'd probably steer someone away if they're really price-conscious or into that whole artisanal, local coffee shop vibe - like my neighbor who's always posting about her $6 single-origin pour-overs from some hole-in-the-wall place. Starbucks isn't trying to be that, and honestly, I don't have time to hunt down the perfect indie coffee spot when I just need my usual vanilla latte before my 9 AM.
What would this brand need to do differently to become your clear first choice?
Look, Starbucks is already pretty much my go-to - I hit the one on South Lamar probably four times a week on my way to work. But honestly? They need to fix their app and mobile ordering mess. I can't tell you how many times I've ordered ahead, shown up, and my drink isn't ready or they're out of oat milk. When you're juggling a toddler and trying to get to a 9am client meeting, that's infuriating. Also, can we talk about these prices? I get that everything's more expensive now, but when my usual order hits $7, I start questioning my life choices. They need some kind of loyalty program that actually saves me money, not just gives me free cake pops I don't want.
"It's become this weird status symbol where carrying their cup signals you have your life together, even when you're totally drowning."
Tyler represents a disillusioned former customer who has actively shifted away from Starbucks due to perceived corporate hypocrisy. As a Portland-based graphic designer, he values authenticity and local businesses, viewing Starbucks as having become disconnected from its community-focused origins while maintaining performative progressive messaging.
Without prompting, which brands come to mind first in this category? Where does this brand land in that mental list?
Honestly? When I think coffee chains, Starbucks is still the first name that pops up, even though I've been trying to avoid them lately. Then probably Dutch Bros since I'm in Portland and they're everywhere here. Local spots like Stumptown and Blue Bottle come to mind too, but those feel more like "real coffee" places, you know? Starbucks used to be my default - like, the safe choice when I needed caffeine and didn't want to think about it. But now they're probably third or fourth on my list because of all their weird pricing games and the fact that they keep pushing their app so hard. It feels too corporate and pushy, like they forgot they're supposed to be selling coffee, not trying to harvest my data.
Walk me through your honest first impression of this brand — not what they claim, but what you actually believe.
Look, Starbucks feels like corporate America in a green apron, you know? They've got this whole "third place" community vibe they push, but when I'm actually in there, it's just people on laptops ignoring each other while overpaying for burnt coffee. I mean, I still go sometimes when I'm desperate, but it's not because I love the brand — it's because they're literally everywhere and I know what I'm getting. It's convenient mediocrity wrapped in feel-good marketing about supporting farmers or whatever, but then they're union-busting their own workers. That disconnect really bugs me as someone who actually cares about where my money goes.
What 3–5 words do you most associate with this brand? Give me your gut, not what sounds polite.
Corporate. Overpriced. Ubiquitous. Performative. Look, I get that they're everywhere and people rely on them, but honestly? They're just another massive chain that's gotten too big for their own good. The whole "third place" community vibe feels so manufactured now, especially when they're charging $6 for a latte while their baristas are fighting for basic benefits. It's like they want credit for being progressive but they're still just maximizing profit like any other corporation.
How has your perception of this brand shifted over the past year or two? What drove that change?
Honestly, Starbucks has gotten way more corporate and disconnected from what I used to respect about them. Like, they used to at least pretend to care about sustainability and worker rights, but then you see how they've been fighting unionization efforts while jacking up prices on basic drinks. A plain latte shouldn't cost $6, especially when you know they're squeezing their baristas. The whole vibe has shifted from "community coffee shop that happened to get big" to just another massive corporation extracting maximum profit. I've been hitting up local spots like Case Study or Coava instead - yeah, it's sometimes more expensive, but at least I know where my money's going and the coffee's actually better.
When would you actively recommend this brand, and when would you steer someone away?
I used to recommend Starbucks to people who needed a reliable workspace - you know, consistent wifi, predictable atmosphere, decent coffee. But honestly? I've been steering people away lately, especially my friends who are also freelancers watching their budgets. Like, $6 for a basic drink when there are local coffee shops doing better pour-overs for $4? That's just not sustainable for people like us. I'd still maybe recommend it to someone visiting from out of town who just needs something familiar and fast, but for regular coffee drinkers in Portland? Come on. We've got amazing local spots that actually care about their community and aren't jacking up prices while cutting portion sizes. Starbucks feels more like a corporate convenience than a coffee experience now.
What would this brand need to do differently to become your clear first choice?
Honestly? Stop pretending they're some socially conscious company while still being this massive corporate machine. Like, I see their "ethical sourcing" marketing but then they're union-busting and charging $6 for a latte that probably costs them 50 cents to make. If they actually walked the walk on sustainability and worker rights instead of just slapping green logos everywhere, that would mean something. Also, maybe stop trying to turn every neighborhood coffee shop into a Starbucks - some of us actually like supporting local businesses that aren't part of some global empire.
"They're just another massive chain that's gotten too big for their own good. The whole 'third place' community vibe feels so manufactured now, especially when they're charging $6 for a latte while their baristas are fighting for basic benefits."
Maria represents a lost regular customer - a healthcare professional who has been systematically priced out of routine Starbucks usage despite valuing the consistency and experience. Her relationship has shifted from habitual to occasional treat, driven purely by affordability constraints.
Without prompting, which brands come to mind first in this category? Where does this brand land in that mental list?
Honestly? Starbucks is probably still number one, but that's more out of habit than love at this point. Like, when someone says "coffee shop," they're the first name that pops up. But then I immediately think about how much they cost - we're talking five, six dollars for a drink that I can make decent enough at home for like fifty cents. Dunkin' comes to mind second because their prices are way more reasonable, especially with their app deals. I've actually been hitting them up more lately because I can get my caffeine fix without feeling guilty about spending my grocery money on coffee. Local places are third in my head, but only if I'm treating myself or meeting someone - they're usually even pricier than Starbucks but at least I know where my money's going.
Walk me through your honest first impression of this brand — not what they claim, but what you actually believe.
Look, Starbucks is expensive coffee that I honestly can't afford to buy regularly on my salary. But when I do splurge, I know exactly what I'm getting - it's consistent, the baristas are usually decent, and I can sit there with my laptop if I need to. It's become this weird luxury for me where I'll hunt for gift cards on sale or use my credit card points just to justify going there. I read all these reviews about people complaining their drinks are inconsistent, but honestly? Every Pike Place tastes the same to me, which is what I want when I'm paying $5 for coffee instead of making it at home.
What 3–5 words do you most associate with this brand? Give me your gut, not what sounds polite.
Overpriced. Trendy. Inconsistent. Look, I used to go there more but honestly? It's gotten ridiculous. Seven bucks for a latte when I'm pulling 12-hour shifts and watching every dollar? And half the time my drink tastes different depending on who makes it. It's become this status thing more than actual good coffee, you know?
How has your perception of this brand shifted over the past year or two? What drove that change?
Honestly? It's gotten way too expensive for what it is. I used to grab a coffee there maybe twice a week, but now I'm looking at $6-7 for a basic drink and thinking "that's almost my lunch budget." The app deals help sometimes, but even with those I feel like I'm getting gouged. I've started going to the hospital cafeteria more or just making coffee at home before my shifts. When you're working 12-hour days and every dollar counts, spending $30+ a week on coffee starts feeling ridiculous. They've priced out people like me who aren't making tech salaries but still want decent coffee.
When would you actively recommend this brand, and when would you steer someone away?
Look, I'd recommend Starbucks to someone who's got money to burn and wants that consistent experience - like if my sister's visiting from out of town and wants to grab coffee somewhere she knows. But honestly? I'd steer away pretty much anyone who's budget-conscious like me. I mean, I'm spending five bucks on what I can make at home for fifty cents. I only go there maybe once a month as a treat, and even then I'm using the app for rewards or hunting for those happy hour deals. If someone's asking me for daily coffee advice, I'm telling them to get a good coffee maker and save themselves three grand a year.
What would this brand need to do differently to become your clear first choice?
Look, Starbucks is already pretty much everywhere I need it to be, but honestly? They need to get real about their pricing. I'm making decent money as a nurse, but when I'm dropping $6-7 on a latte that used to be $4 just a couple years ago, that adds up fast. I started making coffee at home most days and only hitting Starbucks maybe twice a week instead of daily. If they brought back more of those buy-one-get-one deals through the app or had a legitimate rewards program that doesn't take forever to earn anything, I'd probably go back to being a regular. Right now I'm comparing prices with Dunkin' and even McDonald's coffee, which I never used to do. They're pricing themselves out of my routine, and I know I'm not the only one feeling that pinch.
"They've priced out people like me who aren't making tech salaries but still want decent coffee."
High-spending professional customer ($40/week) who uses Starbucks primarily for convenience despite growing dissatisfaction with value proposition. Views brand as having declined from premium to 'McDonald's of coffee' while maintaining premium pricing. Frustrated by service inconsistency, slow operations, and pricing increases without quality improvements.
Without prompting, which brands come to mind first in this category? Where does this brand land in that mental list?
Look, when I think coffee on the go, it's Starbucks first - that's just automatic. Then probably Dunkin', but honestly that's more blue-collar convenience to me. Maybe Blue Bottle or Joe Coffee if I'm thinking about actual quality, but those aren't everywhere when I need them. Starbucks sits at the top of my mental list because they're ubiquitous and consistent - I know exactly what I'm getting whether I'm in Greenwich or midtown Manhattan. It's not the best coffee I've ever had, but it's reliable premium when I'm rushing between meetings and need something that won't disappoint.
Walk me through your honest first impression of this brand — not what they claim, but what you actually believe.
Look, Starbucks is basically the McDonald's of coffee at this point — ubiquitous, reliable enough, but nothing special. I think of it as overpriced convenience. When I'm rushing between court appearances or client meetings, I know exactly what I'm getting and it'll be ready fast. But let's be honest, I'm paying $6 for what should be a $3 coffee because they've created this whole lifestyle brand around it. The baristas act like they're crafting artisanal beverages when really they're just following a formula. It's fine for what it is, but I don't understand people who make it their daily ritual when there are actual good coffee places out there.
What 3–5 words do you most associate with this brand? Give me your gut, not what sounds polite.
Overpriced. Ubiquitous. Inconsistent. Pretentious. Look, I spend probably $40 a week there because it's convenient and my assistant knows my order, but let's be honest about what it is. They've gotten too big for their britches - charging $7 for what used to be a $4 drink, and half the time the barista at the Greenwich location acts like they're doing me a favor. The quality varies wildly depending on which location you hit. It's become the McDonald's of coffee shops, except they still want you to think it's artisanal.
How has your perception of this brand shifted over the past year or two? What drove that change?
Look, I used to think of Starbucks as the premium coffee option - you pay more but you get consistency and quality. But frankly, they've lost the plot on value lately. I'm dropping $8 on what used to be a $5 drink, and for what? The service has gotten slower, not faster, and half the time my usual order tastes different depending on which barista makes it. What really irritated me was when they started pushing all these elaborate drinks that take forever to make while I'm just trying to grab my usual americano and get to the office. I've actually started hitting the local place in Greenwich more often - costs the same but I'm not standing behind someone ordering a unicorn frappuccino with six modifications at 7:30 AM.
When would you actively recommend this brand, and when would you steer someone away?
I'd recommend Starbucks to someone who needs a reliable meeting spot or wants that familiar experience when they're traveling - you know exactly what you're getting whether you're in Greenwich or Des Moines. The Reserve locations are actually quite good for client meetings, much better atmosphere than most alternatives. I'd steer someone away if they're looking for exceptional coffee or value. Frankly, the quality has slipped while prices have gone up - I'm paying $7 for drinks that taste increasingly mediocre. If a colleague wanted serious coffee, I'd send them to Blue Bottle or a local roaster. If they're price-conscious, honestly almost anywhere else makes more sense now.
What would this brand need to do differently to become your clear first choice?
Look, Starbucks is already pretty much my default when I need coffee on the go - there's one on every corner in Greenwich and Manhattan, so it's convenient. But if they want to lock me in completely? They need to stop treating everyone the same. I'm spending $8-12 every morning and I shouldn't be standing in line behind someone ordering a frappuccino with twelve modifications. Give me a premium lane or an app that actually works seamlessly - I want to walk in, grab my order, and leave. And honestly, the quality inconsistency drives me crazy. The downtown location makes my americano perfectly, but the one near the train station burns it half the time. For what I'm paying, that's unacceptable - I expect the same experience whether I'm in Greenwich or Grand Central.
"They've gotten too big for their britches - charging $7 for what used to be a $4 drink, and half the time the barista at the Greenwich location acts like they're doing me a favor"
Specific hypotheses this synthetic pre-research surfaced that should be tested with real respondents before acting on.
What is the actual defection rate among high-frequency customers in the past 12 months, and what triggered departure?
Current sample shows pre-defection signals but all respondents are still customers; understanding actual churn triggers would validate intervention timing
Does operational consistency improvement actually shift price perception, or is price now a fixed grievance independent of experience?
The hypothesis that consistency investments will reduce price sensitivity needs validation before resource allocation
What specific value signals would make price increases feel justified rather than exploitative?
Respondents distinguished between 'expensive but worth it' and 'overpriced' — understanding the threshold inputs would guide value communication strategy
Ready to validate these with real respondents?
Gather runs AI-moderated interviews with real people in 48 hours.
Synthetic pre-research uses AI personas grounded in real buyer archetypes and (where available) Gather's interview corpus. It produces directional signal — hypotheses worth testing — not statistically valid measurements.
Quantitative figures are projected from interview analyses using Bayesian scaling with a conservative ±49% margin of error. Treat as estimates, not census data.
Reflect internal response consistency, not statistical power. A 90% confidence score means high AI coherence across interviews — not that 90% of real buyers would agree.
Use this to build your screener, align on hypotheses, and brief stakeholders. Then run real AI-moderated interviews with Gather to validate findings against actual respondents.
Your synthetic study identified the key signals. Now validate them with 50+ real respondents across 4 audience types — recruited, interviewed, and analyzed by Gather in 48–72 hours.
"How do consumers perceive the Starbucks brand after its recent menu and value controversies?"